Liberal Democracy vs Social Democracy Essay

AbstractThe screen to follow will question what is meant by slack putting surfacewealth. The term will be defined and come along discussed. In addition, it will be contrasted with that of a collectivisticic majority govern. This democratic transcription will be defined in political impairment with compose to valid examples as too will liberal majority rule.The following essay is establish on a contrast amid liberal and collectivistic land from a political perspective. An analysis of the terms, concepts and the question will historical follow. In addition, reference will be made to current examples such(prenominal) as that of the USA, owing(p) Britain, and cayenne pepper as evidence for each fictional character of land that is being examined. Further more, key issues that will be discussed in this opus consist of majority rule as a whole, negative and positive granting immunity within a liberal democracy, and the failure of friendlyism in the third human. F urthermore this essay will prove that Sweden is non a collectivised democracy.In parade to contrast liberal and state-controlled democracy unmatchable must initial hold an saying of what each term means. In grade to go about checking these terms, it is important to first understand what democracy. In simple terms, democracy commode be defined as the rule of the people. A democracy is about the people who come unitedly to decide on laws. And according to Abraham Lincolns Gettysburg Address of 1863, democracy links political sympathies to the people as he raised that democracy is a political science of the people, by the people, and for the people (Heywood, 2014). Universal suffrage plays a purpose in deciding these laws. This term is understood as the still off of al near all adults to vote in political preferences. Depending on the country, in that respect atomic number 18 different requirements which halt to be fulfilled. In the Philippines, citizens have to be at least eighteen years of age, and have to have resided in the Philippines for at least one year and in the region wherein they press to vote, for at least six months prior to the election (Castillo, 2011).There is non always corporal decision-making within every democracy. Zimbabwe for one claims to be a democracy based on the will of the peoplewith a loss leader who claims to a monopoly of ideological wisdom only in that respect isnt corporate decision making. Whereas it really is a totalitarian democracy in which in that respect is absolute dictatorship that pretends to be a democracy. Also here, which is a country strain of democracy, where you elect representatives to make decisions on your behalf.The scope of a democracy defines what should fall under the sovereignty of life, and divides the liberals from the brotherlyists. Heywood (2013) states that liberalism is the ideology of the industrialized West. By this Heywood means that liberalism is a uncorrupted ideo logy that supports favorable progression and the ever-changing of laws through reform rather than through a revolution. The individual is the ancient focus of liberalism, not of revolution. Consequently we can understand liberal democracy as a modern form of governance that denies that popular rule is the ultimate political rule. Leaders are elected by the collective to govern the entity on behalf of the community. In second Africa not all leading declare voted for by the collective delinquent to the fact that there are provisional elections that are only open to those citizens residing in that province, such as you could not vote in Cape Town if you live in Gauteng. But you choose to vote for an overall party during the elections based on the rule of the law and thusly the election is desolate and fair (Yufo, 2008).Great Britain is an example of a state which has a liberal democracy even though it is also a monarchy (Evolution News, 2014). It is considered a laissez-faire li beralism in that the politics are free to do as they choose for up to 5 years before the next free and fair democratic election The British declaration political settlement of 1688 is evidence that Great Britain became the first liberal state in 1614. Another liberal democratic state is the get together States of America according to the American Declaration of Independence of 1776 as granting immunitys such as that of thought, speech, association and religion are all fundamental liberties that take priority over popular rule (Gutmann, 1993). Liberal freedom within this democracy is a characteristic of negative freedom as individuals are equally free and comforted from collective decisions. Negative freedom has no external constraints on the individual or the collective due to the freedomsavailable to them and the fact that there is no interference in decision-making and a lack of forces which prevent individuals from doing as they please.Although in South Africa, government h as implemented the Secrecy Bill. This bill is somewhat a farewell to democracy, as the freedom of speech is no longer a right, as both(prenominal) citizens and the media have been censored by government. The purpose of the secrecy bill is to protect state in geological formation (SABC, 2013) and many people would argue that this silencing is due to the egocentrism of politicians that are involved in activities such as corruption. Laws such as this contradict democratic freedoms such as that of speech. Positive freedom can be defined as having some control over your decisions. This is an autonomous state which gives you as the individual an education for example in order for you to reach your full potential. The government also provides grants and subsidies to assist individuals in achieving this potential. The formation of free and compulsory education, public health systems limit the freedom of the capitalistics to sweat workers, but give worker the opportunity to develop as humanity race beings. Positive freedom has been built up due to the struggle of the workings class which in which the legislation limited the hours of work per day, per person and abolished kid labor (Marxist, 2014). In the words of J.S Mill the only freedom which deserves the lift is that of pursuing our own good in our own way and this is just what Liberal democracy aims at achieving as American and Great Britain citizens have individual and property rights which are both a principle of classical liberalism (Heywood, 2014, p32).Socialist democracy in essence is a modern version of friendlyism. All these notions were integrated but there are small bankers bills between them. Social democracy takes some of its principles from socialism such as free opening move and the focus on societal framework. Whereas capitalism, private enterprise and maximation of life opportunities are more democracy than socialism. In theory South Africa is an example of democracy as the constitution states that RDP housing is provided by government (Rabbani, 1994), due to the fact that government provide grants and education in order to correct the ills of Apartheid. Socialism, by definition, is a systemmarked by the common ownership of the means of production (Legon, 2013).Having said so, we can simply understand it is a democracy that uses socialist reforms in their referendum. It is pivotal to make this distinction between socialism and socialist democracy as they are not the same concept and often the two terms are confused. A social democracy is a government that uses democratic process but also consists of characteristics that resemble those of a socialist society as mentioned in the above. Social democrats generally are committed to acting for the common good. In a government that is a social democracy, the government plays an active role in regulating certain political and economic conditions (Jablonsky, 2014). A socialist democracy is a Marxist organisation which belie ves that the poverty and misery and the burdensomeness and exploitation that marks their society is the result of control of the worlds wealth and productive resources by a tiny class that exploits the Brobdingnagian majority of society. This leads to humanity crippled by the reality and ideology of capitalist society.In the Soviet Union, China, Vietnam and Eastern Europe socialist democracy is the dominant allele system. The trouble of the people in liberal democratic countries is not as wretched as it is in socialist countries, due to the fact that in communist countries, political and economic system are imposed on society by party officials therefore resulting in untold human suffering and severe psycho-economic exploitation. Both liberal democracy and socialist democracy may be considered forms of political democracy because these systems are based on economic and political centralization (Evolution news, 2014). Many would argue that socialism has failed and that the Cuban ec onomy is a disaster and when Cuba found itself caught in disagreement therefore facing both the merciless US blockade and enduring the interruption of all trade with the former members of the socialist bloc, leaders of the Cuban revolution told the people either we stand our ground or we turn a loss everything we have achieved under socialism (Legon, 2013).This brings us to discuss the failure of socialist democracy in third world countries. This democracy promised prosperity, equality and security. besides it is evident that it rather delivered poverty, misery and autocracy. Equalitywas achieved only in the virtuoso that everyone was equal in his or her misery. Socialism is now a bankrupt, discredited, and blemish nineteenth century theory that has failed miserably in countries around the world (Perry, 2014).We can agree that Socialism has collapsed because of its failure to operate under a competitive, profit- and-loss system of bookkeeping. A profit system is a very utile mo nitoring tool which frequently assesses the economic performance of every enterprise (Perry, 2014). The firms that are the most efficient and most successful at function the public interest are rewarded with profits. Evidence of a socialist democracy can be seen in Chile as their changeover to democracy has still not been achieved. After a decade of non-combatant rule, the state mud under the military dictatorships 1980 constitution. According to the writings of Alejandro Reuss The professorship has made sure to not aggravate the still-powerful Armed Forces. He has insisted that his relations with the Armed Forces are excellent and that they can work together for Chile. The Chilean Socialist leader Ricardo Lagos has declared that Chileans should stop worrying about the past, concentrating instead on their future together (Reuss, 2001). The above clearly proves that socialism has failed in the third world.The question of whether Sweden is or is not a socialist democracy has risen many times before in the past within the left internationally, with regards to the politics and economy of the Nordic state or if Sweden is an alternative to neo-liberal capitalism (Olsson, 2009). Sweden has never been a socialist society as it is based merely on public ownership of production, workers control and management, social equality and a democratic plan of production which are characteristics of a socialist entity according to Olsson (2009). Neither has Sweden been a mixed economy. In fact it is one of the most well off countrys to date. It is evident that the social democrats and the trade union movement in Sweden are facing a historic crisis as they have lost roots, tempt and support, with no prospect of regaining their old ground as their insurance and methods mean further attacks on what is left of the general welfare system. The social democratic party has nonplus an empty shell (Olsson, 2009) but that doesnt change the fact that Sweden is not a socialist democracy. In conclusion, there is a major contrast between liberal democracy and social democracy. Evidently a liberalist democracy is built on the foundations of organic social solidarity with private ownership of production, empirical (demonstrable, verifiable reasoning), scientific, reflective and constructivism. The pursuit of the sterling(prenominal) possible welfare for all is a major view of liberal democracy. It considers the State as an association like any other, generally managed no better and no more efficient than others and wishes the abolition of all monopolies as well as the disappearance of classes and that there should be no more proletariats (Lesigne, 1887). Liberals wish to leave each in possession of its own and desires everybody to be a proprietor. The latter promises liberty and makes the State the employee of the citizen. Whereas socialist democracy is based on collective ownership of the means of production, political restrictions, and is dogmatic, meaning that the g overnment is inclined to lay down principles as undeniably true as well as being destructive. Socialist democracy wishes for the governed class to become the governing class and that that there should be none but proletariats. The most obvious distinction is that socialist democracy wishes to take everything and all positions away(predicate) from everyone and impound them (Lesigne, 1887). The greatest contrast between both democracies is that liberal democracy is the future, while socialist democracy is the past.Bibliography1.Gutmann, A (1993). a companion to present-day(a) political philosophy. 2nd ed. Australia Blackwell Publishing. p413. 2.Heywood, A. (2013). Political Ideas and Ideologies. In Heywood, A Politics. 4th ed. United Kingdom Palgrave Macmillan. 31, 32. 3.Kuttner,R. (2005). Liberalism, Socialism, and Democracy. for sale http//prospect.org/article/liberalism-socialism-and-democracy. wear accessed 13 defect 2014. 4.Legon E D. (2013). Cuba and the Alleged Failure of Socialism. purchasable http//www.havanatimes.org/?p=99148. Last accessed 17 marchland 2014. 5.Lesigne, E (1887). Liberty V. p5.6.Olsson, P. (2009). Sweden Is Sweden Socialist?. Availablehttp//www.socialistworld.net/doc/3752. Last accessed 15 present 2014. 7.Perry, M. (2014). Why Socialism Failed. Available http//spruce.flint.umich.edu/mjperry/socialism.htm. Last accessed 15 display 2014. 8.Rabbani, F. (1994). SA ANCS RECONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Available http//www.africa.upenn.edu/Govern_Political/ANC_Recon.html. Last accessed 16 environ 2014. 9.Reuss, A. (2001). Thirty Years of Chilean Socialism. Available http//www.thirdworldtraveler.com/South_America/30Years_ChileanSocialism.html. Last accessed 15 show 2014. 10.SABC. (2013). National Assembly approves Info Bill. Available http//www.sabc.co.za/news/a/8612bb8041cd7c3e8bd9cb5393638296/National-Assembly-approves-Info-Bill-20131211. Last accessed 16 March 2014. 11.Unknown. (2009). Political Liberalism. Available http//www. 123helpme.com/preview.asp?id=74492. Last accessed 13 March 2014. 12.Unknown. (2014). Liberal Democracy. Available http//evolutionnews.co.nz/liberal-democracy/. Last accessed 16 March 2014. Unknown. (1688). Bill of Rights 1688. Available http//www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2/introduction. Last accessed 17 March 2014. 13.Unknown. (1776). The Declaration of Independence. Available http//www.ushistory.org/DECLARATION/DOCUMENT/index.htm. Last accessed 17 March 2014 14.Unknown. (2014). Glossary of terms FR. Available http//www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/f/r.htm. Last accessed 16 March 2014. 15.Yufo. (2008). http//www.studymode.com/essays/Liberal-Democracy-140567.html?utm_campaign=transactionalEmail&utm_source=sendgrid&utm_medium=email. Available http//www.studymode.com/essays/Liberal-Democracy-140567.html?utm_campaign=transactionalEmail&utm_source=sendgrid&utm_medium=email. Last accessed 17 March 2014.